Find a Lawyer

FIRHAN FAHEEM versus DISTRICT JUDGE

After the conclusion of the affirmative evidence of the defendants applying for permission to submit documents for the Declaration of Suite 12th, Rr 1, 2 and Section 115 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), section 42, the defendants had to make some evidence Moved a request for permission to. The documents said the trial court accepted, but in a review filed against the trial court's order, the application for preparation of the documents was dismissed by the appellate court, the trial court granted permission to prepare the documents on two grounds. Was given, before that many documents were attempted to be created. The case presented by the defendants came into existence during the proceedings which did not exist before and the second stated that the court only required documentation for the decision of the trial, while the defendant's request It is also learned that the plaintiff will have the freedom to present. In rejecting the said documents, the evidence was rejected by the appellate court's order in the review by the trial court on the basis that the documents were disputed and the documents requested to be prepared intermittently. , Since it has not yet begun, this phase cannot be termed as bountiful because the defendants were not subjected to any prejudice because they were allowed to appear, even in the denial of evidence. Otherwise in any case the order was admitted, it was not appropriate to review the jurisdiction of the appellate court order in review, in which case the appellate court violated the law and best law firm from Daud Khel lawyer