Find a Lawyer

STATE versus GUL FARAZ

Section 302/324/34 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Appeal against the Criminal Tribunal Court against Section 417 Trial, Given the medical, medical and recovery evidence on record, it has rightly concluded That the father of the victim was and that the prosecution's witness who was the victim's brother was contradictory and controversial. The defendant's trial court correctly denied such evidence; the prosecution was primarily to prove guilt against the accused beyond the shadow of credible doubt, to present credible, credible evidence for the purpose of proving conviction. If an individual is on a capital charge, the evidence must be of very high quality and of good quality, which were not available in the present case, and the reasons filed by the trial court for the defendants' conviction were based on a correct assessment of the evidence, No basis was provided from High Court intervention in appeal list of supreme court advocates from Miran Shah lawyer