MUHAMMADI KHAN versus MEHMOOD KHAN
OI, R 10 & O IX, Rr 6 & 7 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Request Forward proceedings, Defendants' cancellations which were compulsorily enforced by the party were regularly represented by a lawyer But after that she failed to appear before the court, a previous action was taken against her. The trial court simultaneously accepted the request for the cancellation of the former party proceedings filed by the defendants and the appellate court's plaintiff challenged such concurrent orders in the constitutional petition, to keep the two parties proceeding separately. No limit was set. The courts passed orders to seek justice and to assist in the misuse of the law, a constitutional petition was filed against the unanimous orders of the courts below, so that the matter could be settled for as long as possible and the defendants. Exclude aliens / women from their obligations. The plaintiff's owner, the plaintiff, failed to state that the circumstances were justified, interfering with the simultaneous orders of the courts below, the constitutional application was dismissed.
property advocate from Kotla Pathan lawyer
