Find a Lawyer

RAZ MUHAMMAD ALIAS RAM JANEY versus THE STATE

Section 497 (1), third provisions [since the Criminal Code of Conduct (Amendment) has been removed by the Ordinance (LIV of 2001)] of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/34, guaranteed by lawful suspension. Bail was sought on two grounds; first that the accused was arrested before the amendment, under which the third provision of section 497 (1), the CCPC relating to the legal delay was deleted and the second That even after the bail was granted to the co-accused, the accused was entitled to the same treatment as per the rules of consistency, though according to the third section of section 497 (1), at the time of the arrest of the accused, the PC Existence existed, but until then, the accused was under constant detention, while a misunderstanding and illogical basis was laid. In the two years of imprisonment, the third rule was also exempted by the amendment, the circumstances of the case were not attracted to it as the third provision of section 497 (1) in the case of the accused had a very different benefit, C. CP was not available for the accused, his bail plea dismissed online advocate from Shahdad Pur lawyer