Find a Lawyer

JAN ALAM versus MUNTAZIR ALIAS MUTAZIR

Section 324/334/337 R was charged with payment of damages on the right foot of the offender because the accused was convicted by the trial court and found guilty, but did not pay the appropriate compensation. According to the complaint filed by the accused under Section 242424, the complainant was permanently paralyzed and disqualified due to the accused's alleged misconduct on the complainant. , While the trial court convicted and convicted the accused under Section 242424, PPC. It is important to keep in mind the provisions contained in the second part of this section which provided compensation to the affected persons under the provisions of Sections 4 & 7 337R, provided that the PPC provided that the offender Will be responsible for the payment of the debt, which was half of the money paid. In the present case, the number of accused, being four, each accused was responsible for paying half / half of the amount of money. For the offender's complainant to adopt the normal lifestyle of nature, in view of the permanent nature of his or her disability, the defendant in favor of not allowing the complainant to be compensated for his or her injury under section 242424 There was no shortage, the PPC accused was directed to collect the money. The throne in the trial court should be given to the complainant within a specified period Pakistan, top advocate family court from Parachinar lawyer