Sections 10, 18 and 32 of the Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), the appeal against the Section 173, which failed to take seriously the reference given by the Chairman, NAB, under section 18 (a) of the Ordinance. That on the police report submitted under section 173. The CRPC, in addition to the convicted principal accused, had to submit a reference against them to the appropriate course for prosecuting the acquitted accused and not their names in Column No 2 to Column No. 3 of the report under Section 173. By request to move. The chairman, NAB, did not approve the case, citing legal proceedings against the acquitted accused. The charges could not be leveled at the request of the prosecution court. And can only prosecute the offender who was found responsible for the trial of the chairman, NAB in the trial court, and therefore could not stand trial. Since no charges could be laid against the accused, they should be acquitted but they were declared acquitted and their verdict was dismissed as a result and the appeal against the accused's fate was dismissed accordingly. ?
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
