Find a Lawyer

KHADIM ALI versus THE STATE

Section 2302 (A) / 4/4 337 A (7) / 7 337 F (I) / evidence 34 Definition of Evidence Five persons were named in the FIR, including two accused, but three of them were acquitted. The complainant's statement revealed that the co-accused had suffered injuries to his body, but said that no one was ever mentioned in the FIR and that such injuries were reported. There was a dispute between the complainant's medical account and it was evident that he was not hurt by the alleged injuries to be a witness in this case. The possibility of lying to the co-accused cannot be ruled out in this case because the co-accused was also found innocent by the police as the complainant was injured by the complainant two months before the incident and Under section 2424, there was a PPC. The possibility of false involvement in the case against the complainant, pending and blackmailing and coercing the accused, cannot be ruled out. The appeal filed by the co-accused was accepted and his conviction proved to be a crime. In relation to the accused, the ocular account was declared separate, however, it was fully verified by medical evidence, the gun was recovered from the accused and two crime branches were recovered from the place where the accused was found. The victim was shot and reported to the firearm. Experts said that on the basis of the indictment of the prosecution, the evacuation of gun-fired crimes, in the circumstances, had undoubtedly proved his case against the accused, the appeal of the accused was dismissed. best advocate from Wazirabad lawyer