Find a Lawyer

ANAR GUL versus LAC

The Section 4 Special Relief Act (of 1877), the acquisition of a land suit for the claimants of section 42, was that they were the owners of the suit land that the government had obtained from them for the construction of the factory without notice and that the claimants were entitled. ? The authorities' suit was rejected by the courts on the basis of jamabandi under the accused, whose record was presented in the High Court order and it was said that they were the tenants of the occupied land In this case the suit should be considered the owner of the land. (A) The jurisdiction of section 4 of the North West Frontier Province Tenancy Act, 1950 could not be found sufficient to establish whether the claimant was a CL (A) under section 4 of the North West Frontier Province Tenancy Act, 1950 Will fall into the realm of Jambundi said that "dedication" was vacant in which real estate was not portrayed and in the circumstances it became a problem - whether under the section 4 of the Illegal Northwest Border Tenancy Act, 1950 (a) ) The suit had become the owner of the land and deserved the compensation of the disputed land. The present data are not sufficient to give a definitive inquiry into the issue. The case is remanded to the trial court by the High Court. Received property advocate from Mansehra lawyer