Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAFIQ versus THE STATE

Section 2302 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), defining section 7 evidence, was fatal to the prosecution recording the accused's judicial confession in a retiring room after court time, making this case suspicious and unpredictable. Legal arrest and detention and confession of the accused is a crime. Recovering the body of a deceased person was also, according to legal documents, unlawful in police custody and cannot be relied upon. The body, which had been reported in advance about the police and the people of the area, could not be recovered on the identity of the accused as it did not have specific knowledge of it, the last time evidence came out in this case. The recovered rifle was not sealed in a parcel at the location of the retrieval and no safe delivery was made to the firearm specialist. According to the records, his recovery was highly suspicious that the empty part of the crime recovered from the nearest location was not shown in the inquiry report in column 23. In such cases the medical evidence leg remains of no importance. Because it's not in any way. It was helpful to identify the culprit The proper and honest and fair evidence to be investigated in the case was not obtained at various successive stages. The accused was acquitted with the benefit of the doubt in the circumstances. pakistani advocates Rajana lawyer