SYED MATCH COMPANY LTD. versus AUTHORITY UNDER PAYMENT OF WAGES ACT
Sections 15 and 17 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 1993 payment of salaries payable by the applicant (employer) were filed by the applicant against this order instead of appeal. The Court dismissed the constitutional petition as a matter of complete absence of jurisdiction and could not be construed as an economic jurisdiction. The authority cannot be held liable even after the claim of the respondents (employees) being on the higher side, the party had no discretion to ignore the provisions of the appeal and to file a constitution. There was no material on record to disregard the treatment provided under section 17 of the Wage Payment Act, 1936, the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court under section 17 (1) (a) of the Wages Act, 1936 A call was made to revoke the effect. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and dismissed the appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Thatta lawyer
