Find a Lawyer

KHALID SAEED versus SHAMIM RIZVAN

Regulations 17, 51 and 96 of the Lahore Development Authority Act (XXX of 1971), Sections 2 (AA), 4 and 17 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 199 of the residential property of the Gymnasium, Squash Court and Swimming Use as a commercial basis, the Authority granted such permission on the basis of continuous instruction issued by the Chief Minister's Respondents (Affiliate Landlord), the Constitutional application granted such exception. , Which was allowed by the High Court and the intra-court dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner. The applicant's qualification was accompanied by a BA, Third Division Certificate of Short Courses on Sports, Medicine and Nutrition, which lasted from one day to one week in which the petitioner could not be called a professional. Development Magazine 51 could benefit from this. Authority building regulations, and 1984 and and allow it to be converted into a gymnasium, squash courts and swimming pool, so that consumers are invited to take advantage of such facilities. Similar activities on arid commercial grounds, if allowed, seriously damage the use of the adjoining property of the respondents and the inhabitants of the same area and thereby destroys its peaceful environment. And the privacy of its residents is compromised. Obtaining permission from the authority, but using his influence only, he sought direction from the chief minister, on the basis of which the authority allowed him to be the chief minister of such illegal scheme under the Lahore Development Authority Act, 1975. Which was such a recipe property advocates from Kalar Syedian lawyer