Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HUSNAIN BUTT versus S.S.P., FAISALABAD

R6 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) The police officer was dismissed on the charge that his standard of living was beyond his income and his service record revealed that he was poor in service. Record keeping has a bad reputation. A black stain for the officer's police department service record stated that a violation of section 10, adultery (Enforcement Hood) was read with S, 109, PPC under Ordinance 1979 but action was taken under section 265. A lawsuit was filed against him. The CCPC session judge acquitted her on technical grounds despite the fact that Assistant Superintendent of Police was found naked in the adjoining police station with a woman who made a sudden visit with another police officer. Only the service was reinstated: In that case, under section 265, its application was accepted under the CCPC and it was acquitted of the charges, so they were about to re-instate the institute authority. It was completely crushed during: On the one hand, an inquiry report prepared by D-section P, which stated that the employee was found guilty during the investigation, after checking the record by the competent authority, issued a show cause notice to the officer and contested. After doing so, he dismissed him from the job and the appellate authority dismissed his appeal as well as the officer's service contract. Yabonel said there was no proper inquiry into the matter, and a validity officer from the police force raided the company. Other police officers and the things presented to them proved themselves to be from the officer famous supreme court advocate from Lahore lawyer