Find a Lawyer

MASNOOR-UL-HAQUE SOLANGI versus PAKISTAN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, KARACHI

Section 13 and 3 (1) Allotment of accommodation to the officers of the Karachi Rules, R13 (iii) Residential accommodation was allotted to the employee of the corporation The services of the employees were transferred to another legal corporation and occupied according to the agreement. Charges were being deducted from employees' salaries and sent to the corporation who owned and allotted the employee's residence, which was terminated by the transfer corporation which the employer defaulted on payment of occupancy charges after the suspension of employment. Had done. As a sovereign entity defaulting to the payment of professional compensation, recently, as a sovereign entity, the provision of the Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance 1979 will apply and the corporation that owns the property maintains the application. Can To be removed under the said ordinance and not subject to section 3 (1) of the Sindh Rent Limitation Ordinance, however, the issue of employees, however, to Rule officers R13 (iii) of Allotment Allotment. I came in stating that if an officer is dismissed, terminated or removed from a job, she prefers to appeal or apply. Against his dismissal, dismissal or removal order, he may be allowed to retain his decision to postpone his stay on his appeal or application when the employee is already demanding his dismissal and is served by the service. The service has finally been restored with all returning benefits. The tribunal, which was still pending before the Supreme Court, which had discharged, awarded the High Court verdict against the employee who was in legal employment. advocate for immigration from Sargodha lawyer