Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ versus THE STATE

Section 2302/11/11 / evidence 34 Definition of FIR in the case was filed on FIR 12 1999 12 1999 lodged on and the deceased was post-mortem on 12 1999 1999 1999 1999 1999 Acc Acc. According to the accused, before or on the 7th, he had committed an extra-judicial confession. May 2000, in which the accused confessed that he had killed the victim 10/15 days before committing a confession with his co-accused, saying that if the prosecution's witness believes the victim to be killed April 25 or 26 2000 was made while the matter is in this case. The death of the deceased was already reported to the police on 12 12 1999, and the post-mortem of the victim was made on 13 12 1999, which took place about four months before the extra-judicial confession was committed, in which case, she lied. There was no need for the accused to appear before the prosecution witness as he had nothing to do with the complainant, nor was he a person of authority; The recovery of the revolver on the identification of the ring and the suspect does not link the suspect to the commission of the crime; in the circumstances, this is the case. Is to combine serial events like this. The court can only conclude that it was the person who committed the crime, but in this case it was missing the important fact that the prosecution could not, without any doubt, prove its case against the accused. Was able Create a tent in the prosecution's story, the prosecution's story against the accused by trial, the benefits of the dentures involved in sentencing and sentencing, were set aside and they were brought against them. top civil advocates from Nowshera lawyer