Find a Lawyer

ABDUL SAEED KHAN versus SECRETARY EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, CIVIL SECRETARIAT, LAHORE

Rr 4 (1) (a) (ii), 5 and 7 Removal of Service (Special Powers) Ordinance (IV of 2000), Section 13 Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII of 1974), Section 23 (2) Advertising Promotion The government employee from BS 16 to BS 17 was deferred on the basis of this: Negative comments and inquiry officer regarding his integrity in his ACR for the relevant period of the criminal case against him. The government employee recommended the ACR be fined for the relevant year. Public employee not informed Negative comment cannot be considered on non-official contact, to delay his case for promotion against a public servant as far as promoting a criminal case is concerned. There was no specific rule, but according to the instructions issued by the 9th Authorized Authority, 1962, which contained the rules and regulations in accordance with Section 23 (2) of the Punjab Civil Servants Act, 1974, it was a serious offense against a public servant. The authority authorized to take the case was released. o Suspend or ignore the matter for publicity of the job, canceling the dispute of the Government employees that the inquiry proceedings against them were made offensive under the Punjab Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1999. Was removed because the Special Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, from Punjab, saved the pending proceedings under the Punjab Civil Servants Act, 1974 and the question of postponement of development on the basis of rules and regulations. The final decision was made, however, by the competent authority to release it. tax advocates from Gojra lawyer