JAVAID IQBAL RAJA versus MUHAMMAD ISHAQ BHATTI
The petitioner and one of the defendants were parties to the order of the decree, fraud and collusion of sections 12 (2) and 115 and were tenants in the suit shop. The trial court dismissed the petition against them. ? An appeal was filed under section 12 (2), CPC and the appellate court, while setting aside the order of withdrawal, dismissed the request that the appellate court should decide the matter and after that the appeal should be decided. There was no cohabitation or fraud. On the face of the record, the applicant's partner contested the withdrawal case, filed an appeal, took the opportunity before the High Court and after failing, the applicant appeared at the scene with the present petition, investigating the fact. No need to apply for allegations High Court denies interference in order passed by appellate court review dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Bhalwal lawyer
