Find a Lawyer

YAQOOB SHAHZAD versus THE STATE

Definition of section 302 (b) (c) of the evidence against the accused was that he opened fire on the deceased as soon as he got in his father's way and prevented the accused from being shot and he got hurt and then the accused. Another shot fired the victim's case. Version; one of them came from the mouth of the prosecution's two witnesses, who were respectively the real brother of the deceased and the nephew of the victim, while the second version was presented by the accused in his statement under Section 2342, the CRP submitted by the accused. The C version was most condemnable and convincing because the incident happened in front of the accused's house and in addition the father of the accused was killed because the other accused wanted to kill his father. It was unclear why the shooting occurred, as the Medico Legal Report revealed the name of the person who was taken to the hospital with injuries. No mention of it was found in the corresponding column. The suspect mentioned the name of a relative or friend that he himself had appeared to police on the day of the incident, but his arrest was revealed the next day. The version of the accused was the same which he presented to the trial court in his statement under Section 342, CRPC, and said that the version is of great importance because the complaining party was raising doubts about drug cases. , The benefit of the doubt was given to the accused and the trial and the sentence against him were set aside by the trial court and he was acquitted of the charge. advocate for immigration from Pirpai lawyer