Find a Lawyer

AJAB KHAN versus PARVEZ

The suit for filing the suit on Sections 6 and 13 was filed on two grounds, namely `Shafi Khat 'and` Shafi Jar \' suits, however, the following courts have simultaneously sued the plaintiff for the suit. Was ordered. He did not own the land in his case, nor did he present any evidence in this regard that the plaintiff had not filed any petition for modification of the boundary so that the plaintiff's new land of joint partnership And the evidence presented by the plaintiff was purely was. Based on a partnership in Sutland; however, he did not say a word about the two foundations, namely, "Shafi Khalat" and "Shafi Jar" which were taken into the Factor of the Competitiveness section, which he claims. Was not made, the plaintiff cannot benefit from it without any modification. The plaintiff can neither request additional qualifications nor add evidence of such qualification, after the plaintiff fails to obtain the necessary amendments to his claimant, he may in no way be relieved on any such ground. There is evidence on such evidence that was not entitled on his behalf. The plaintiff is not considered in favor of concurrent decisions, and the orders of the courts below were set aside in review of the law being unprofitable. immigration advocates phone number from Warah lawyer