PAKISTAN STATE OIL COMPANY LTD. versus MALIK HADI HUSSAIN
Under a contract to send its dispute to a particular court under Article 28 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), VI VII, R 10, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the plaintiff in the civil court, Before the plaintiff company filed an application before the Civil Court under OVII, R 10, CPC, it asserted that pursuant to an agreement between the parties, only the civil court was subject to any dispute between the parties. The decision was granted, therefore, the plaintiffs were argued and barred from taking jurisdiction. At the Civil Court, the El Court denied the request on the ground that the application for jurisdiction over the civil court against the parties was contrary to the mandate of section 28 of the Treaty Act, 1872. Referring to a dispute arising out of them to a court whose jurisdiction cannot be considered contrary to public policy does not violate the provisions of section 28 of the Contract Act, 1872, and any such agreement is deemed to be lawful. And the parties will be obliged to follow the same agreement between the plaintiff and the plaintiff company through which the civil court has been given jurisdiction between the plaintiff and the plaintiff company to entertain and decide Lashkar. In order to resolve the dispute between the parties, a revision request was allowed in the circumstances, the unnamed order was set aside and the request of the plaintiff company under O VII, R 10, to return the claimant to the CPC In the LL court, the civil court was accepted with instructions. Plaintiff to appear before a court of competent jurisdiction
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
