Definitions of abduction, unnatural crime evidence for Article 367 A & 377 Physical Conduct On the day when the victim did not identify the location of the alleged victim Victim during the investigation of the case, he himself admitted that he voluntarily The accused went with him, while in his senses part of the victim's statement was enough to separate the sentence. Under the section 6767 AA, the victim's PPC Medico legal certificate did not show signs of torture on any part of his body, except that a small calf was infected, according to the victim , For the first time an unidentified person committed the misconduct with him, but the prosecutor failed to establish the identity of the unknown person. The swab taken in the anus was positive, which was against the principles of medical jurisprudence because during this period, Victim was exposed to multiple stools. Or the wash. The prosecution cannot be prosecuted solely and solely on the doctor's opinion to prove the allegations leveled against the accused without any provocative and convincing evidence presented by the prosecutor who was missing in this case. , No notification of mini grouping was obtained. The prosecution or prosecution was presented during the trial, which was a valid piece of evidence in such cases, when more than one victim was charged with misconduct when the victim's clothes were ever presented to the investigating officer. Or were not presented to the trial court. Apart from the person affected, there is no other spectacle of the incident
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
