It was not only the requirement of the law to send the notice of the requisite evidence of the section 13 students, but also to the plaintiff that the notice of service was required under the law to prove that the plaintiff prepared five receipts for sending registered AD but the postal statement was relevant. , Who deposed that he received four registered letters of distribution, the plaintiff did not submit the notice to the alleged author of the notices to prove the envelopes, so the students sought the standard evidence required by law. Eshad's performance was not proven. The investigations filed by both the courts in favor of the plaintiff were not only against the law but also against the prescribed rules of law, so they were not sustainable and on the contrary were revised. Accepted
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
