Sections 2?2 (b) and 4e am The testimony of the prosecution witness in his statement contradicting the testimony of another witness who was the brother of the deceased, the testimony of the deceased was not appreciated. There was deliberate misconduct and the complainant also hid the injury on the victim's forehead, causing her to testify as the accused's witness. The person who made dishonest improvement / printing of his statement was incapable of reliance; it was not safe to rely on the evidence of eyewitnesses, who in their statements before the trial court to remove the weaknesses in the prosecution case. Faithful concealment / correction, and the eyewitnesses were the only witnesses to the opportunity to bring their evidence to the evidence as mediation was located 12/13 km from their residence, and they There was no complimentary or convincing reason for his presence on the spot at the relevant time. The delayed, feasible explanation for the delay in post-mortem examination without delay was an indication of the fact that at the time of the incident, witnesses were not present. And witnesses were delayed in the preparation of the police papers, the investigation of the post-mortem was necessary, the recovery of the evidence pump pump 12 bore gun, the identification of the accused on this matter was unnecessary, as the forensic science laboratory reported only In the absence of a blank or face-matching report with the Pump Action 12 bore gun for being in the working order, the alleged recovery of the gun on the suspect's identification was of no use,
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
