UBEDUL HAQ versus MUHAMMAD TUFAIL
Section 117 West Pakistan Land Revenue Rules, 1968, R67A High Court (Lahore) Rules and Orders, Volume 1, Chip IM (i), RR1, 2, 3 and 4 Hood Skinny Cases, Suit for Recovery In the Land Acquisition by Defendants in Procedures, the courts below barred the parties' requests for a valid and genuine identification of the legal justification dispute and non-compliance with R67A of the Appellate Court of Land. Report was not weighted. West Pakistan Land Revenue Rules, 1968 On the actual dispute whether the defendants had landed on the land owned by the plaintiffs or whether the mystery has been disposed of, special procedures should also be followed in such cases. As per the rules and regulations of the High Court (Lahore), the first, Chep IM (i) did not follow such a procedure by the trial court or suggested by any of the parties. We and the procedure resulted in illegal and material irregularities by the courts, and such concurrent decisions of the courts below would not stand in the way of the High Court to remove such wrongs, so the High Court did not. Decided to put aside controversial decisions. Pending new judgment in accordance with High Court (Lahore) rules and procedures prescribed in law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Hala lawyer