Find a Lawyer

MAQSOOD AHMAD versus THE STATE

Sections 302 (b), 334, 337 R&337F (iii) the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), the definition of the evidence of Section 7 accused was specifically designated in the FIR filed, from the accused The attributable injury was fully corroborated by the participation of medical evidence. The suspects in this case cannot be doubted because the witnesses of the four prosecutors who were injured in the same incident were fully involved in the commission of the crime. The prosecution's witnesses had no previous hostility to the accused's perjury, while legal compensation came with his co-accused. Armed and fired at the scene of the incident and shared the common intention with his co-accused in the argument that the accused had only shot at the unimportant part of the victim, he was innocent because he was responsible for the victim's death and Because of his injuries, the prosecution's witnesses were alleged to have been found guilty as well, which strengthened / strengthened the prosecution case in the prosecution's case. Any suspicion filed by the trial court against the accused, And the wings against the accused have been proven beyond the charge of maintaining the sentence immigration advocates contact from Kot Bunglow lawyer