Find a Lawyer

CH. MUHAMMAD ALI versus HAJI FEROZ DIN

O XLI, R 19 Deletion of default in the restoration of the appeal for restoration of appeal of the West Pakistan Civil Rental Ordinance (VI of 1959), section 15 (6) of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), sections 5, arts 168 and 181 Appeal list from appeal 22 5 2000 was dismissed on appeal 24 6 was filed in 2002 and 12 10 was filed under section 5 of 2002. The list was removed due to inadequacy. With appeal it will be considered without notice. And that neither section 181 nor the 168 of the Limitation Act 1908 shall apply in the present case. Applicant's lawyer's name was occasionally appearing in the Cause List from time to time on 22 April 2000, when the respondent was the respondent through the respondent, regarding the delivery of the Cause List to his lawyer. The nominee and his lawyer did not specify how long it would take to file a reinstatement request, and then the late applicant did not specify the delay each day, which would have led to All such matters were broken. In the pursuit of the applicant, the tolerance, detachment attitude and conduct of the applicants were not, under any circumstances, prevented from appearing on Article 168 of 2000, nor was there any reason for such matters in Article 181 of the Limitation Act, 1908. The facts and circumstances apply. Both such requests were dismissed registration advocate from Tobatek Singh lawyer