MUHAMMAD BAKHSH versus KHUDA BAKHSH
The suit was decided by the trial court for possession on the basis of section 8 case, but the appellate court upheld the injunction by the maintenance plant that it did not appear that the possession of the land was given to the plaintiff under the allotment order. In which the plaintiff submitted. There was no description of the plot and no place in support of his claim, so neither a copy of the allotment was presented, nor a certificate which showed that he had the allotment under question. Was denied, the plaintiff's oral evidence was not supported by any document. The circle admitted in cross-examination that the land was part of a population village that was not the state's land. And that the said land could not be identified as there was no alteration or any record of the possession of the alleged allotted land under the alleged allotment. The appellate court submitted that the applicant had failed to prove his case unimaginable
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Pasroor lawyer
