Find a Lawyer

MST. JAMILA BEGUM versus THE GENERAL MANAGER, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, LAHORE

R 3 (1) (e) (i) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition for Charitable Fund Petition It was claimed that after the death of her husband in 1972, the respondents of Pakistan Railway Was an employee of The grant from the Welfare Fund was approved throughout her life or until her re-marriage but she was not paid despite the fact that she was not remarried. Petitioner sought direction for the defendant. It was supposed to be a grant. The welfare fund for his lifetime is permissible because the charitable fund grant was approved by a letter dated 12 7 1972 and it was still or until the applicant was remarried due to the fact that the applicant had re-married. Was not married and approved and acted upon. The respondent could not be allowed to submit a rail application from the same High Court which allowed the writ petition and the respondent was directed to pay the sanctioned charity fund grant as requested by the respondent. Acceptable immigration advocates contact from Gohar Ghoushti lawyer