Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARIF versus MUHAMMAD SHAHZADA

Section 5 Case For Advance Occupancy Proof Of Sale For Sale In consideration of market value, consideration of sale on land entering mutation was Rs 10,000 but the seller filed a written statement urging him to buy the suit land. Opposed the case. After the trial court decided the trial court's decision in favor of the plaintiff against the payment of Rs. 10,000 against the Wendy Appellate Court for consideration of Rs. 000, the market value of the suit land was increased, 000 83 thousand rupees. The justification for consideration for the sale of the property was to determine the market price factors, such as location, fertility etc., and the vendor had to review the Patawari Circle on the location of the land in the relevant case in the present case. Appeared as a witness and revealed that he paid Rs 18,000 to the shopkeeper at the time of this transaction and Rs 65,000 after confirming the change, through a check in the presence of a witness, who dismissed the check. After the siege was paid Rs 5,000, except for the contradictions that appear, the seller had the best way of proving through bank record preparation that he did not select when there was the best possible evidence available and that too. In the form of documentary evidence which the bank has maintained, oral evidence that was contentious and inaccurate cannot be relied upon in judgment and the order of the appellate court Inspiration was set aside and the trial court had been restored in the trial. advocates from Bhirya Road lawyer