Find a Lawyer

MAQSOOD KHAN versus THE STATE

Section 2 30b (b) FIR of the testimony testimony that resulted in the deceased's declaration showed that the deceased had died before his death, a simple and Gave a straightforward calculation, though he did not mention details about the origin of this iteration. In this case, his only witness also gave a simple and straightforward statement of the incident that affected the trust's ocular account, such as the declaration of death, and the statement of the prosecution's witness, medical evidence. It was quite right that the announcement of death was. Not free from the temptation to point out, repelled, because nothing was on record to prove that the victims of the police station were falsely accused of the absence of enmity between the parties. , Was another factor that ruled out the possibility of an immediate death. The possibility of alternatives to falsify the suspect was reduced because the suspect was alone and the distance of light on the day of the incident shown in the location plan could not be very conclusive as the site plan showed no evidence of this. It was not until the witnesses were confessed to confront the details, but it was prepared on their offer. In the present case, there was no contradiction of the eyewitness testimony with which the accused, for more than four years, went a long way to validate and strengthen the truth of the prosecution version against the accused by a long, plausible and unidentified operation. Will go , The trial court rightly found guilty of the charge or immigration advocate from Hangu lawyer