Find a Lawyer

HAJI FAREED KHAN versus MAMON-UR-RASHID KHAN

Clause 20 and 21 of the Specific Relief Act (in 1877), Section 454 Civil Code (V of 1908), Section 9 and O VII, R 11 suit for permanent injunction, for loss of money recovery The approval of the case was transferred during the dismissal of the application The defendant's requirement to obtain jurisdiction over the plaintiff's dismissal by the defendants required that the civil court have a trial in relation to the environmental issue. There was no jurisdiction and that in the presence of special law in the form of Pakistan, the Environmental Trial Court proceeded to understand that on the wrong premises. The aerial authority and the accompanying entertainment and the environmental tribunals were created with special protection so that serious offenses could be tried under the Pakistan Environmental Protection Act 1991 and a 30-day notice to the affected person tribunal in the relevant federal agency or provincial But instead of resorting to a tribunal to resolve complaints to the plaintiffs, they referred directly to the civil court, dismissing legitimate requests for justification as invalid. With respect to the facts and circumstances of the case and the reliefs claimed by the plaintiffs, T The Royal Court was quite justified in saying that the civil court had the legal authority to entertain the environmental tribunals case. Settled to deal with matters related to environmental pollution, etc., but in view of the reliefs contained in other substances, including the recovery of damages, the civil court had jurisdiction over the trial court, in which case, it properly sued the plaintiff. Refused to be denied law firms from Gambet lawyer