TAJ MUHAMMAD KHAN versus BAKHT SHERY
O XVII, R 5 and section 115 hearing date The application to set aside the ex parte decree record shows that the case was settled in 1 2000, the presiding officer was on leave, thus making the case on the reader's note. Deferred. 28 1 2000 On the day the trial court dismissed the application for the separation of the former party proceedings, which was filed on 17 7 1999, the day on which the earlier proceedings were initiated, the notice of postponement by the reader was recorded by the court itself. No, the trial court could not say the date of the hearing and the appropriate course, in the circumstances, that date had to be postponed and then the application to finalize the parties' proceedings on 28th, 2000 had to be rejected. Was not in accordance with The following courts failed to define the law applicable to this case
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Jamshoro lawyer