Find a Lawyer

ABDUL KABIR KHAN versus RAHAM ZEB KHAN

O III, R4Auths Act (X of 1873), Section 8 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 High Court's Special Jurisdiction for Recovery of Money, Based on Special Oath Presented by Revision Court ?????? The applicant's position was that the Special Power of Attorney did not authorize the attorney to offer a special OOH and he had decided from the special court through the special court through the central court. This matter should have been decided on the merits. That it was unable to understand the conditions for the special and it faced litigation and that the false claim could not be proved by special specialty and the reviewing court had no jurisdiction to swear On the basis of improper interpretation. The affidavit was decided by the applicant's lawyer who was bound by the applicant and he could not refrain from whether the lawyer was competent to make such an offer, which was a question of fact. Maybe. By virtue of the constitutional application, the High Court, in exercising its powers under Article 199 of the Constitution, will generally not be based on the practice of determining complex, contested and complex questions such as resolving contentious issues, usually left to the appropriate forum. Was. , Has been suggested by any law, because engaging in such an exercise will have the effect of pre-empting and enforcing the offense. Officers and courts are legally participating under this law. best advocate from Nowshera lawyer