LT.-COL. (R) ABDUL WAJID MALIK versus SAEED AHMAD KHAN, SECRETARY (SERVICES), S&GAD, CIVIL SECRETARIAT, LAHORE
Section 3 Punjab Civil Service Pension Rules, 1963, R 1 8 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 204 Petition for contempt of court for contempt of court, he had applied to the competent authority for resignation, respondents Did not issue a pension Because of the displeasure of the respondent's actions, the petitioner filed a contempt petition requesting that the respondents be deliberate with the law resolved by the Supreme Court. The sinner should be punished and his answer should be read. The applicant revealed after a letter to the respondents that the defendants did not commit contempt of the Supreme Court because they did not violate this decision as the applicant of the Supreme Court as a public servant. Earlier, the Service Tribunal High Court had adopted an alternative method of filing an appeal before dismissal. Applicability as well as abilities
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
