Find a Lawyer

ABDUL KHALIQ versus JUDGE FAMILY COURT

Section 5 and Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan, (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for dissolution of marriage based on marriage ?? Defendant rejected the trial court's decision to resolve marriage-related marriages or substitute for dissolution of marriage. Said that the settlement was illegal because the marriage bargaining case could not be turned into a case of dissolution on the basis of oath, especially when there was no specific plea or prayer for Khulla in this case and That the decree was approved. The defendant's moderation was misconstrued without causing any issues about the dress because the suit was not converted into one to dissolve the marriage. The suit was in question whether the marriage was intended to dissolve the marriage or for the alternative, and the prayer clause specifically requested that the decree be adopted in the alternative decree to dissolve the marriage. Which had the jurisdiction to dissolve the marriage on the basis of khula \ despite the fact that the term khola was not used exclusively in the plaintiff but it was There is evidence on which it was clear. That the plaintiff hates the defendant for the defendant and that the spouse cannot stay within the limits of the plaintiff of God that the court cannot easily assume that the spouse is not pleasant in the light of the defendant's statement. Live what Rashti did. The place was not taken and the parties did not get a chance to stay together because the man and the wife were repulsed because the wife was happy with her consent and choice. pakistani advocates Kahuta lawyer