Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HANIF versus THE STATE

Section 2302 (b) / & 34 & 6 336/34 ????? Definition of proof was delayed in recording of FIR and it was not recorded in the police station. According to the FIR, the accused person had three fireworks wounds, But his post-mortem report revealed that he suffered only four wounds and no firearms. There is a difference between a pistol and a knife if the victim's father was present on the spot. He would not have made such a big mistake when, after filing an FIR, the ocular account was in clear conflict of medical evidence, resulting in the accused being charged under section 230b (b) / PP charge. Was exempted from However, the testimony was fully proved by the accused under which the injured had committed one eye offense and the conviction of the accused under section 666 / under 34 was maintained under the circumstances. best law firm from Talagang lawyer