Find a Lawyer

KHALID versus THE STATE

Section 2 (2 (b) / re 34) of the evidence, the defendant, whose name was included in the FIR, was armed with a 12-bore gun at the time of the incident and fired two shots at the victim, which resulted in his falling down. Went to the hospital and was later discharged to the hospital, the witness at this time cannot be expected to report any part of the body of the victim. Respect, in the circumstances, would not be the case because the FIR was immediately filed to terminate the prosecution's story on the basis of it. Whether the post-mortem was delayed because the persons who identified the body of the deceased were asked the doctor to conduct a post-mortem examination on the arrival of the deceased's father. It is understood that the doctor had to undergo a post-mortem examination immediately and should not have been postponed at the request of the person who identified the deceased's father. The deceased's father would not like to replace the accused for his original culprits. Both the prosecution witnesses, who were the father and brother of the deceased, could not be considered witnesses and witnesses of the occasion. Yes. Otherwise, the trust could not be excluded from consideration only because of their relationship with the dying weapon and on the indication that live cartridges were also recovered from the accused's house, prosecution was also established in the cases. Was, in the circumstances, a charge against the defendants under Section 302 (b), when fully established. PPC, he was truly found guilty, even though he was armed with a revolver immigration advocates phone number from Ghotki lawyer