MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus THE STATE
Section 497 Impeachment Code (XLV of 1860), Ss 365/452/302/324/337 H (2) / 109/148/149 bail, the defendant's grant was not mentioned in the FIR, but more After a period he was designated for a month on the complainant's supplementary statement, even in the statement, it was said that the accused was driving the truck in which the alleged kidnapper traveled to the company of another co-accused. The accused character was not distinguished from his co-accused who had already been allowed to submit challan to the bail court, there was no room for denial of bail, the accused was admitted in bail. Contact
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Sahiwal lawyer
