Find a Lawyer

SAIDAN BEGUM versus GHULAM ALI

Arts 142 and 144 of the Punjab Tenancy Act (XVI of 1887), section 5 suit for occupying the land as the plaintiff was recorded in the Revenue Record as the defendant, without paying the defendant's rent. The suit was dismissed through a trial that was listed as non-resident tenants. The court, but the appellate court proved the defendants' title to the verdict, but they were not allegedly disposed of, nor were they allegedly requested to be disposed of, nor was there any evidence Nor did the defendants purchase land whose entries in the column deduction were unacceptable. Entry into the occupancy column will be affected by the defendants as the tenants under the plaintiffs will not convert the non-payment of rent for any period to negative possession for any purpose. best law firm from Tando Mohd Khan lawyer