Find a Lawyer

MRS. G.C. NELSON versus MST. SABINA SAMEEN BASHARAT ALVI

Section 2 (2) Homeless Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958), Section 10 and Schedule Permanent Transfer (Houses and Shops) Rules, 1961, R4 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), Section 9 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application Validation of property after the issuance of PTD: Settlement options Transferred property on the basis of jurisdictional jurisdiction The respondent accepted the property purchased in the open auction, but Not sure what property the notified officer transferred to the post-remand. Action Before the applicant's possession of the property purchased by the defendant in the open auction before the applicant's property failed to be identified, the notification officer filed a complaint with the Municipal Corporation and the Excise and Taxation Department. Relied on records, but did not consider survey rules. Claims by the parties to the Department have been out of the pool of compensation since the PTD was issued in their favor, but the settlement authorities had thus become a functioning offseason for determining and limiting the property. Because the homelessness (compensation and rehabilitation) Act, 1958, to the extent given in the PTD or the rules, was repealed, the High Court deemed it opportune for both parties. To prove your case by presenting evidence before the civil court, which was the final jurisdiction of the jurisdiction, the High Court accepted the constitutional petition and, with the observation, settled the unconstitutional order that the parties to the civil determination of their right to dispute the property. Please refer to the court. best law firm from Dhirkot lawyer