Find a Lawyer

CH. MUHAMMAD SAEED versus RIAZ-UL-HAQUE

AXVII, R3 and OXXXVII, Rr 2, 3 suit for the amount of recovery based on the promise gap failed to present defendant evidence despite numerous delays, on several postponement dates of the hearing, neither evidence presented Whether or not any witness was summoned by the court proceedings, nor was there any witness of the defendant in the last date of the hearing, but the defendant himself did not appear before the court and in that date the defendant did not The evidence was discontinued; defendant's behavior was in no way complimentary; there was nothing in the record to show that the hearing On any given date, the presiding officer of the court was on leave or the case was postponed for some other reason when, despite providing ample opportunity, the plaintiff failed to present his evidence, at trial, at trial, There was no option left, but the circumstance of the defendant's approval of the CPC Order Trial Court, seeking the provisions of OXVII, R3, cannot be interfered with in the circumstances. best advocate from Mirpur Mathelo lawyer