Find a Lawyer

MUSHTAQ AHMAD versus THE STATE

Section 2 (b (b) / 4?4 / 7 337F (iii). Defining evidence) There was no serious dispute at the time of the incident, and the time to file a formal FIR in the police station immediately. Was filed and was presented by the Auler Account Four witnesses, of whom two injured witnesses stated that the witnesses were residents of the same area and there was nothing in the record to believe that the statements of the witnesses were all material of the case. The evidence was the same and the same was confirmed. None of the independent witnesses, including the shop owner, appeared to be available on the defense version at the time that the injury was sustained. By one of the suspects, the complaining party could have been the attacker, because he had no power. The trial court itself, however, found evidence of the injury suffered by the accused itself. The circumstances, rightly determined that the prosecutor had settled his case under the movie as the complainant had done or This was explained in the statement at the trial, however, the trial court eased the case for sentencing the accused to death. Was enough to demonstrate. The death sentence was reduced to life imprisonment solicitors from Nowshera Cantt lawyer