A. VIII, Rule 1, 9 and 10 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application is required in submission of written statement, requirement of the Word in VIII, R1, for failure to submit a written statement on the importance of CPC and for prosecution. The respondent filed a specific case. During the performance of the agreement against the applicant and during the trial, the right to file the applicant's written statement was stopped by a trial court, which asked to dismiss the request, but the lower court of review The review application was dismissed before the petitioner, the applicant also claimed that the trial court was not justified in defending the applicant and so the review petition was also illegally dismissed and the reviewing court below It did not exercise the jurisdiction which is required in Civil VI of VIII, R1. The Code of Conduct, 1908, was of the utmost importance, and it was important that whenever a written statement was presented and there was evidence to be found on record, subject to the constitutional restrictions of VIII, R 10, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, The court required this in mind as needed and it would also be stuck in a dictum where a written statement would be, without the full understanding of the implications, as would many innocent parties. Delays were approved for preparation of OVIII, R1, CPC, or VIII, R9, which was allowed to be filed under CPC. Which could not satisfy the law regarding the requirements of the court. Only the written statement that the court required by the Speaking Order, O. VII, R10, CPC
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
