Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABDUR RASHID versus THE STATE


The Pakistan Penal Code section 302 (b) and 324 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), section 7 (a), the value of the evidence was inconsistent with the complainant's stated statement 18 days after the incident. The complainant's presence was suspected that one month and seven days after the incident, the firearms expert was sent against the crime, the report of the firearms expert's meeting was not forwarded to the prosecution, the complainant said. The ocular testimony presented was controversial. The assailants did not give details of the assailants in the firing by the assailants. Identity was not paraded as per the rules. Defense created tents in the case of prosecution, which the accused had to give the accused. Was acquitted of the circumstances.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates contact from Sudhnoti lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.