ABDUR RASHID versus THE STATE
The Pakistan Penal Code section 302 (b) and 324 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), section 7 (a), the value of the evidence was inconsistent with the complainant's stated statement 18 days after the incident. The complainant's presence was suspected that one month and seven days after the incident, the firearms expert was sent against the crime, the report of the firearms expert's meeting was not forwarded to the prosecution, the complainant said. The ocular testimony presented was controversial. The assailants did not give details of the assailants in the firing by the assailants. Identity was not paraded as per the rules. Defense created tents in the case of prosecution, which the accused had to give the accused. Was acquitted of the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Abdul Hakim lawyer
