Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ANWAR versus MST. NAWAB BIBI

Section 42 and 54 Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), Section 554 Civil Code of Conduct (VV 1908), Section 115 With the clarification of the specific contribution of joint property, the dispute in the present case was that the property was joint and Not yet divided, when sellers sell their share with the specific description of the boundaries in favor of the seller without dividing the property by being a partner, other partner partners attacked the sale and the appellate court Deciding the case and setting aside the sale in which the seller presented. The shopkeepers were co-operatives and sold their share of the property in real estate to the seller, although the co-partners, however, did not own the specific loss numbers and, therefore, transferred the plot along the lines in their favor and Was not legally entitled to separation. The appellate court did not make any wrong reading or non-reading. The High Court refused to take any concession in the judgment and the order of the appellate court as there was no illegal process or irregularity by the courts as the appellate court's decision did not identify the jurisdictional jurisdiction. jobs for advocates from Pasni lawyer