Find a Lawyer

DR. FOZIA AMBER versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB

Article 25 (F) Defense Housing Authority Lahore Ordinance (LE 1999), Section 18 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Court Judicial Review Scope Petitioner, In the present case, Registrar, Cooperative Societies filed a review petition against the order. ? Such a revision in the provincial government before the Co-operative Secretary could not have been due to a change of law because after the cancellation of the Law Housing Authority Lahore Ordinance, for the purpose of Article 25 of the Defense Housing Authority Lahore Ordinance, 1999. ? (f) Defense Housing Authority of Lahore Order, 2002, which was a forum providing natural remedies and providing treatment to the aggrieved persons before the Executive Board, and if the applicant was an applicant, it would be fair and equitable. Not fair. Absence of ratios, irrelevance or disproportionate proportion, which in turn constitutes a center of unfair judicial review, even as you may find that the applicant's case is subject to the provisions of Article 25 (f) of the Order. It does not have to be strict inside, which has enough power and authority to save a party from oppression and to deal with injustice with authority. The matter is to be sent or remanded to an authority / functionary in the dispute so that the Secretary may hear and resolve the complaint of the party order approved by the cooperative of the province. The High Court had declared it had no legal effect. Consequently, the review petition filed by the applicant will be considered pending, which will be transferred to the Executive Board and will be followed by a hearing and law. famous lower court advocate from Dadakhel lawyer