Find a Lawyer

MST. SAIMA versus THE STATE

Section 498 Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 420/468/471 Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Sections 10, 7 and 9 of the Christian Marriage Act (XV of 1872), Sections 4 and 5 of the Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 35 UN Convention on the Elimination of All Types of Discrimination Against Women, Article 16 Pre-arrest Guarantee, Confirmation of Family Protection Female Applicant Claims to Have a Male Applicant Legally He has a married wife, and he is not guilty. Whatever his complainant had committed, it was stated to the Additional Sessions Judge that the under-marriage was forged and Father Reverend accused him of committing a marriage under the Christian Marriage Act, 1872. Had no license to give. The applicants (women and men) committed the correctness of adultery. Both the applicants stated that they had been married; this is the first instance of the crime. Article 35 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) and Article 16 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Types of Discrimination against Women of the United Nations were ordered to protect the institution of marriage and family by a state prosecution against applicants. ? High Court affirms petition to confirm applicant's pre-arrest bail advocate from Ukba lawyer