WAQAR AHMAD versus CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN BAITUL MAL
Section 11 (1) (iii) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973); Termination of the services of the constitutional applications of Arts 199 and 212 Government employees have terminated their services in the constitutional petition of the High Court. It was challenged before the termination authority that such orders could be challenged only before the service tribunal, not in the constitutional plea that the government employees of the high court claimed that there was no service tribunal, that their constitutional petitions were viable. Earlier, a civil servant had filed an appeal against the transfer order before the service tribunal which ruled that the government employees. Yin was on merit. Under the circumstances, it cannot be said that there is no service tribunal to appeal against the orders of their termination order under which the services of public servants were terminated, although challenges were also made on the basis of bead utility; The service was presented before the tribunal and could not be challenged before the High. In view of the bar contained in Article 1212 of the Constitution, Pakistan (1973), in the constitutional petition
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Kot Addu lawyer