Find a Lawyer

MALIK SULTAN MEHMOOD versus SME BANK LTD.

Sections 10 and 9 (5) of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O VII, R 11 apply for leave to defend the plaintiff's case by the Banking Court, under Rule 11 and O VII, R 11 Had filed a separate case for. After the plaintiff's appearance, the summons provided under the law was issued to the defendants, in response to the submission of the mandatory order of the accounting before the banking court, in response to which the defendants filed leave petition to defend the case. These requests were postponed to submit transcripts and responses to the stay petitions, then, cases were submitted, adjourned to hear arguments on those requests, which were addressed on the due dates. And the requests were postponed to a later date for the announcement of orders. On the same date, the plates were rejected. On hearing the important petitions for leave on the petition for leave for the trial, the banking court could not reject the case in which the High Court had dismissed the case. Rejected the decision and dismissed the order with the decree that the suit would be considered. Pending pending before the Banking Court, which had already been directed to decide, applications for leave to defend the case were granted and if leave was granted to defend the case, surely the mainstream The judge will decide the banking court. In accordance with the law ask a advocate free from Narowal lawyer