SALAH-UD-DIN, ASSISTANT ENGINEER (MKDA) versus SECRETARY, FORESTRY, WILDLIFE, FISHERIES AND TOURISM DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE
Punjab Civil Servant (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1975, R6 (3) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition denouncing the seriousness of a person being questioned and imposed major penalty applicant Murree Kahuta. Was an employee of the Development Authority. The petitioner was made against, he was issued a show cause notice and without any inquiry, he was fined a huge fine of Rs 500,000. The Appeal Authority of the Jurisdiction considered the petitioner's appeal. In view of the fact that no inquiry was made in this case, before imposing major penalties, the applicant involved in his representation was responsible for the claim and the original or involved in the case. Detection of other offenders should be considered in the proper context. Hearing of the applicant's hearing at the appeal stage, the Byte Appellate Authority did not approve the article. The ion to be taken by the applicant's order passed by the authorities was without legal authority and was set aside. , The case was remanded to the appellate authority for judgment
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
