Find a Lawyer

AHMAD versus KHADIM HUSSAIN

Section 44 Civil Code of Civil Procedure (v. 1908), O. VII, R 11, the plaintiff and the defendant who rejected the temporary injunction were co-owners of the property in dispute and had the relevant part of the property, which In the grip of the grip, they say they will be forcible. Defending plaintiffs by disposing of the area they occupied, the plaintiff sued OVII, R 11, C.P.C., for dismissing the case, rather than seeking legal action, rather than resisting the case. Apply under Allowed together on the basis that the plaintiffs were unable to establish that they were the exclusive owners of the separate territories covered by the common territory, such a request could hardly be a ground for rejecting a claim in which relief It was requested that the plaintiff cannot be expelled from any other country. The practice of law, although every co-owner is considered to be the owner of every inch of a shared suit, will not work, but it is clear that one of the co-owners of a common suit was forcibly evicted from there. May be under which the following two courts had proceeded illegally. Iii. They were dismissed, dismissing the case filed by the following plaintiffs, which directed that the case should proceed. This is the case before the merit trial will take place online advocate from Fizagat lawyer